Archive for April, 2008 Page 2 of 2



George Will calls Jeremiah Wright the “Gift that keeps giving” to the McCain Campaign [updated]

In his column today, George Will calls Jeremiah Wright, Senator Barack Obama’s spiritual mentor of 20 years, “a gift determined to keep on giving.” Unfortunately for the rookie senator from Illinois, Wright’s rhetoric is actually helping Senator John McCain, the Republican candidate for president. In “The Gift That Keeps on Giving“, George Will writes:

Because Wright is a gift determined to keep on giving, this question arises: Can persons opposed to Barack Obama’s candidacy justly make use of Wright’s invariably interesting interventions in the campaign? The answer is: Certainly, because Wright’s paranoias tell us something — exactly what remains to be explored — about his 20-year parishioner.

In Monday’s speech at the National Press Club, Wright repeated — decorously, by his standards, but clearly — his accusation, made the Sunday after 9/11, that America got what it deserved. His Monday answer to a question about that accusation was: “Whatsoever you sow, that you also shall reap” and “you cannot do terrorism on other people and expect them never to come back on you.”

Will goes on to call Wright on his speech given to the NAACP on Sunday night:

On Monday, Wright also espoused the racialist doctrine that blacks have “different” learning styles than do others. This doctrine of racially different brains, or of an unalterably different black culture, is a doctrine today used to justify various soft bigotries of low expectations regarding blacks, and especially black children. It has a long pedigree as a rationalization for injustices. Slaveholders and, later, segregationists loved it.

It will be interesting what Obama chooses to do about this latest controversy surrounding the man that married him to his wife and who provided the title for one of the Senator’s books.

Michelle Malkin yesterday pointed out that Wright’s security is provided by the Nation of Islam. This only serves to strengthen the public impression that Wright is aligned with Luis Farrakhan bringing that anti-Semitic hate monger closer to Obama in the public’s perception.

PowerLine has a Wright article likening Wright’s relationship with Obama to Thomas Eagleton’s relationship with George McGovern. In the article, the following is written:

In his widely lauded Philadelphia speech, Barack Obama declared of Reverend Jeremiah Wright: “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.” It wasn’t quiite up to George McGovern’s expression of “1,000 percent” support for Thomas Eagleton as his running mate after revelations of his shock therapy, but it left Obama and Wright closely joined. Something about the revelation of Eagleton’s shock therapy made his ultimate dumping by McGovern inevitable. Something about Wright’s frank racism, among other things, now calls for some further response by Obama.

Unfortunately, for the rookie senator, it will be harder to disassociate himself from the pastor that he chose to take his family (including his young daughters) to hear “preach” — this recent media outburst by Wright keeps the public’s attention on the dubious choices that Obama made about his closest spiritual adviser.

[Update #1: 4/29/2008]
According to Politico, Obama has announced that he will be holding a “big press conference” to address his relationship with this divisive individual.

Way to protect your pop-star meal ticket daughter Billy Ray! [Updated]

In today’s sex driven culture, it’s incredibly naive to believe that the profit driven media will keep our children’s best interests in mind when they create entertainment and create articles in magazines. But it’s incredibly sad to see a father not protect his 15 year-old daughter from being exploited in a racy and raunchy photograph.

This is exactly what happened in a photo shot by Annie Leibovitz, possibly the most famous photographer in the world, of teen pop Disney sensation Miley Cyrus. Miley’s father, Billy Ray, was on the set to witness and APPROVE of this manipulative exploitation of a minor for Vanity Fair, and he [See Update #2 below] failed miserably as an advocate and protector for his young and impressionable daughter.

Telegraph has coverage of the controversy including the picture itself. The picture itself is of a topless Miley with lipstick smudged on her face and tussled hair. How could her father possibly approve of this crap and [See Update #2 below] sit back and allow it to happen? She’s a phenomenon and makes an incredible amount of money and we would hope that her father’s approval of the picture [See Update #2 below] this is not based primarily on marketing Miley as a sex object. That would be truly sad. Whatever happened to parental responsibility?

In the article, we read about Disney’s disapproval:

Executives at the Disney Channel are said to be furious about the shot, which is a far cry from the star’s usual squeaky-clean image.

A spokesman for the network said: “Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines.”

The Times Online has additional coverage in their article “Shame on you Annie Leibovitz, Carter – and Miley Cyrus’s parents.” The article indicates that Miley Cyrus felt considerable pressure from the star photographer:

One can believe Cyrus’s description of Leibovitz’s persuasive powers in the studio, pushing the young actress – fame-hungry and flattered to pose for the world’s most famous photographer for a magazine such as Vanity Fair – into ever more risqué poses. “You can’t say no to Annie,” Miley said. “She’s so cute. She gets this puppy-dog look, and you’re like, OK.”

Indeed, Leibovitz used the trick dirty-old-men artists have employed to seduce vulnerable girls through the ages: she persuaded Miley that the pictures were “artistic”. But this is no celebration of young beauty. It is a blatant bedroom shot. Leibovitz saw the shock potential, the lip-smacking titillation, in posing a star known for her wholesome, girlish role in Disney’s Hannah Montana as if photographed by her deflowering first boyfriend.

Of course, Vanity Fair should be criticized for publishing this picture in their magazine. It’s clearly exploitation of a minor for their monetary gain. But ultimately parents have to step up and protect their minor children. It would have been one thing if the young Cyrus had done something racy with her friends, but it’s creepy that her parents didn’t stop this from getting to this point. They were there, but apparently [See Update #2 below] they were a sleep on the job, the most important job of all.

Update #1 [4/29/2008]:

Continued coverage from Tuesday morning:

Baltimore Sun - ‘VF’ photo makes Disney, Cyrus unhappy
San Jose Mercury News - The Star Report: Who is to blame for stealing away the innocence of Miley Cyrus?
ABC News - Miley Cyrus Grows Up In The Spotlight

Update #2 [4/29/2008]:

Apparently, Bill Ray left the photo shoot prior to the pathetic raunchy photograph was taken basically abdicating his parental responsibility. He failed to guarantee that she would be looked after properly for the rest of the photo session.

Michelle Malkin has coverage here.

Supreme Courts rejects challenge to Indiana voter ID law

To me it’s absurd that anyone would challenge a law requiring a voter to prove his or her identity with a legal government photo id with a current address. How could anyone argue that the requirement of acquiring and presenting a valid id at the polls is too burdensome? News flash, the Presidential election this year is on November 4th. Sometime over the next 6 months it might be a good idea to secure a valid state id in order to vote in states that require one.

The SCOTUS Blog has excellent coverage on the ruling here. Their coverage includes:

The voter ID ruling may turn out to be a significant victory for Republicans at election time, since the requirement for proof of identification is likely to fall most heavily on voters long assumed to be identified with the Democrats — particularly, minority and poor voters. The GOP for years has been actively pursuing a campaign against what it calls “voter fraud,” and the Court’s ruling Monday appears to validate that effort, at least in part. The main opinion said states have a valid interest in preventing voting by those not entitled to do so, even if there is no specific proof of that kind of fraud in the state.

While the Court’s main opinion said it was “fair to infer that partisan considerations may have played a significant role” in enacting the photo ID law, it went on to say that that law was neutral in its application and was adequately supported by the justifications the state had offered.

Of course, liberals are up in arms over this decision. Politico has coverage of liberal politicians and organizations calling the ruling unfair:

“The voting process needs to as unencumbered as possible, and requiring a photo identification disenfranchises those citizens who might otherwise never have a need for identification–particularly in rural, poor, and minority communities,” said Rep. Joe Baca (D-Calif.), chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. “This is a violation of our voting rights – and a deliberate attack on democracy.”

John Payton, president and executive director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, offered a similar concern. “I think what we know from this opinion, what we can be confident of, is perhaps tens of thousands of eligible African-American voters will not be allowed to vote this year because this law has been upheld. That’s particularly disturbing because this is one of the most important election cycles we’ve ever seen in this country.”

John Payton makes an erroneous statement because if under Indiana laws a voter is eligible they will have a valid state id. Payton was looking to the Supreme Court to override the decision of the state and set a dangerous precedent where states would not have the right to define their own laws regarding voter validation.

Later in the article, Politico quotes conservative politicians who rightly agree with the decision:

Republicans, for their part, were uniformly positive about Monday’s ruling. House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said the decision will give Americans “renewed faith in their government’s ability to conduct fair and honest elections.”

House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), whose state saw its photo ID law struck down by a state court, was similarly ebullient.

“By a convincing majority of six-to-three, the Supreme Court today affirmed a principle the American people have overwhelmingly supported for some time: asking citizens to produce a simple form of identification before voting is neither unreasonable nor unconstitutional – and if it helps impede voter fraud, absolutely necessary to ensure the basic integrity of the democratic process,” Blunt said in a statement.

The return of Jeremiah Wright, “The Megalomaniac”

Despite being Senator Obama’s spiritual mentor for 20 years, Jeremiah Wright has to be the absolute last person that the senator would like to see go on a self-serving media tour. Obama is slumping in the polls today, and Wright’s appearances serve to provide Obama’s detractors, a group that includes yours truly, with additional material on the man who had served as Obama’s pastor for the past twenty years. This is the man who baptized his daughters and married Obama and his wife. On Friday, PBS aired an exclusive interview of Wright by Bill Moyers, last night, Wright spoke at a NAACP event, and this morning, Wright spoke at the National Press Club in Washington.

Barack Obama was sworn into his first term as a US Senator on January 4, 2005. Barely three years later during his rookie term, Obama is the front runner in the Democratic race for the presidential nomination. He has been dogged with questions of whether or not he can deliver the working class voter in order to win important swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, and Texas.

Bad news for Obama supporters, so far he is 0-4 in those states. If Senator Hillary Clinton of New York manages to beat Obama in Indiana, she will have a compelling argument to make to superdelegates that Obama is unelectable in a general election against Senator John McCain. She can argue that Obama has failed to win support from the white working class vote and that Obama’s delegate lead has been built with a clever strategy to focus on states that will most certainly go to Republicans in the fall. While it is a strategy that may win Obama more delegates, it is ultimately a strategy that is doomed to fail in November.

Obama has had already to deal with Wright by delivering a politically motivated speech on race out of necessity, he has had to deal with his association with Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers in a nationally televised network debate on ABC, and possibly most damaging he has had to try to spin his elitist remarks indicating that small town Americans cling to religion and their second amendment rights out of bitterness. Those remarks were made at a private fund raiser held at a mansion in San Francisco where he had every reason to believe that his comments would not be leaked in the media.

Despite spending three times what Clinton spent in Pennsylvania, Obama still lost the closed primary by nearly 10 points.

So now we have Wright again. This is almost too good to be true for those of us who believe that Obama is woefully unprepared to serve as the United States President and Commander in Chief. The transcipt of Wrights speech at the NAACP event can be read here.

At the NAACP event, Wright’s rhetoric once again proved to be divisive. This time he chooses to divide America’s children. Instead of focusing on the problems shared by all children, he focused on the teachings of Dr. Janice Hale based off of her research conducted during the 1970’s over 30 years ago. In his speech, Wright states the following:

Dr. Hale’s research led her to stop comparing African-American children with European-American children and she started comparing the pedagogical methodologies of African-American children to African children and European-American children to European children. And bingo, she discovered that the two different worlds have two different ways of learning. European and European-American children have a left brained cognitive object oriented learning style and the entire educational learning system in the United States of America. Back in the early ’70s, when Dr. Hale did her research was based on left brained cognitive object oriented learning style. Let me help you with fifty cent words.

Left brain is logical and analytical. Object oriented means the student learns from an object. From the solitude of the cradle with objects being hung over his or her head to help them determine colors and shape to the solitude in a carol in a PhD program stuffed off somewhere in a corner in absolute quietness to absorb from the object. From a block to a book, an object. That is one way of learning, but it is only one way of learning.

African and African-American children have a different way of learning.

They are right brained, subject oriented in their learning style. Right brain that means creative and intuitive. Subject oriented means they learn from a subject, not an object. They learn from a person. Some of you are old enough, I see your hair color, to remember when the NAACP won that tremendous desegregation case back in 1954 and when the schools were desegregated. They were never integrated. When they were desegregated in Philadelphia, several of the white teachers in my school freaked out. Why? Because black kids wouldn’t stay in their place. Over there behind the desk, black kids climbed up all on them.

Because they learn from a subject, not from an object. Tell me a story. They have a different way of learning. Those same children who have difficulty reading from an object and who are labeled EMH, DMH and ADD. Those children can say every word from every song on every hip hop radio station half of who’s words the average adult here tonight cannot understand. Why? Because they come from a right-brained creative oral culture like the (greos) in Africa who can go for two or three days as oral repositories of a people’s history and like the oral tradition which passed down the first five book in our Jewish bible, our Christian Bible, our Hebrew bible long before there was a written Hebrew script or alphabet. And repeat incredulously long passages like Psalm 119 using mnemonic devices using eight line stanzas. Each stanza starting with a different letter of the alphabet. That is a different way of learning. It’s not deficient, it is just different. Somebody say different. I believe that a change is going to come because many of us are committed to changing how we see other people who are different.

How easy for Wright to be able to lump all black children in one category and all white children in another category. How about Asian American children? How about American children of middle eastern descent? How about children of mixed ethnicity? Furthermore, isn’t Barack Obama himself proof against this divisive theory?

Then this morning, Wright was defiant and combative. In an AP article titled “Analysis: Wright does Obama little good“, Nedra Pickler writes the following:

“If Sen. Obama did not say what he said, he would never get elected. Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls,” Wright said. “Preachers say what they say because they’re pastors, they have a different person to whom they’re accountable. Whether he gets elected or not, I’m still going to have to be answerable to God November 5th.”

Although many of the clips of Wright that have been dogging Obama’s campaign were from sermons that were several years old, the pastor repeated some of the same ideas for television cameras Monday.

He criticized the U.S. government as imperialist and stood by his suggestion that the United States invented the HIV virus as a means of genocide against minorities. “Based on this Tuskegee experiment and based on what has happened to Africans in this country, I believe our government is capable of doing anything,” he said Monday.

Jeremiah Wright apparently questions the honesty of Obama’s denouncement of Wrights anti-American rhetoric as primarily being out of political necessity. We are also reminded of the anti-American and racially charged sermons that were delivered by Wright and the fact that he stands by his hateful statements. That makes it just as relevant today to ask, why would Barack Obama spend twenty years sitting at Trinity listening to Wright and as a parent, why would he subject his family including his two young impressionable daughters to this man? These are questions that Obama has not answered completely, and they will dog him for the remainder of the primary season and into the fall if he becomes the Democrat nominee.

Of the three major party candidates remaining for President, Senator John McCain is clearly my first choice despite his less than conservative record on many issues. With that said, if McCain were to lose in the fall, a Clinton administration is a far less scary proposition in my opinion given how little we know about Obama today.

Michelle Malkin has coverage of protesters at the National Press Club here.

Eric Scheie has coverage of the Wright debacle over at Pajama’s Media in his article titled “Pastor Wright’s Fantasy World of Hyperbole.” In it he writes:

Earlier today, however, I was asked by Pajamas Media to write about this morning’s appearance by Reverend Wright at the National Press Club. Fortunately (so I thought), I didn’t see the email until after the event was over, so I replied that I’d missed it, although I did venture that if I could find the video online I’d watch it and write a piece if it wasn’t too late.

As it happens, it didn’t take me long to find the Wright event on video in six YouTube segments.

Er, now that I’ve watched them all, I should say, six sickening YouTube segments .

20 minutes in, I was just about ready to throw up. The more I watch this malignant man, the less I want to watch. For starters, I find myself unable to stand Jeremiah Wright’s smarmy, sing-songy voice. Now, lest I be accused of racism in the way some have been accused of sexism for not liking Hillary Clinton’s voice, let me say that one of the things I most like about Barack Obama is his voice. He has a pleasant speaking manner, in stark contrast to Hillary’s screechy braying.

I’m no Hillary fan, and I may regret saying this lest it sound favorable to her, but Wright makes Hillary Clinton’s screeching and braying sound almost pleasant.

His supercilious insincerity, and mocking, deriding tone — all while he spews hateful and vindictive far left claptrap — belongs on Berkeley’s Communist controlled KPFA radio, if it even belongs there.

I’ve included the 6 YouTube videos below (after the break) — you may want to wait at least 30 minutes after eating before watching. This is megalomania personified!

Continue reading ‘The return of Jeremiah Wright, “The Megalomaniac”’

How McCain Can Win the Black Vote: School Choice

Inner-city urban areas have a reputation for their failing government-run school systems across the US. These failing government agencies are riddled with crime, truancy, violence, drop outs, and a culture shunning effort and studying. Unfortunately, the government assigns almost all African-Americans to these failing government cesspools. The mere fact that the government requires inner-city African-Americans to be educated at failing government institutions does not fit in with traditional American freedoms.

When given the opportunity, the parents of most inner-city children will choose to send their children to a school that is free of the crime and violence which surrounds their homes and neighborhoods. To most African-Americans, having an opportunity that promises a strong education in a secure environment is a top priority. However, both Democrat candidates seek to ensure that the school choice option is not only off the tables, but completely discouraged. Instead, both Obama and Clinton vow to increase the government’s hold over these schools and maintain the current failed system. McCain has remained silent on this issue.

If John McCain wants to sway the urban voters, this is his ace in the hole: school vouchers aimed at the parents of inner-city school children. Wednesday I will look at how exactly school choice is the first step in addressing the wealth discrepancy plaguing urban areas.

Welcome to the Liberty Preservation Alliance

This is the very first post for the The Liberty Preservation Alliance. Welcome!

I am a 36 year-old male living in the suburbs outside of St. Louis, MO, the Gateway City. (Please read more about me here.) St. Louis is right smack dab in the middle of what I simply refer to as the “Greatest Country in the World.” So, yes, I am unapologetically patriotic, but I also realize that our great country is under attack by many strong forces within in our borders. Among others, activist judges, liberal elitists in the media and academia, and an overly intrusive and ever growing federal government have basically ignored the vision laid out by our founding fathers in the Constitution and specifically in the Bill of Rights.

Enough is enough. My best friend, of over 20 years, and I formed The Liberty Preservation Alliance to vehemently oppose these anti-Constitutional forces and to champion the ideals that founded this great country that include rugged individualism and personal responsibility. Our mission statement is simply as follows:

The Liberty Preservation Alliance was created as a champion for limiting federal government, conserving individual liberty, sanctioning personal responsibility, protecting property rights, and protecting our national interests.

We are Originalists and therefore we will be ever vigilant against both blatant and subtle attacks on our liberties by activist judges and our elected officials. Given that, we will passionately defend Americans’ Second Amendment right to own and utilize guns, vocally call for a reduction of the federal government ’s scope to only encompass those functions which are granted to it within the constitution, strongly call for the enforcement of laws including immigration laws, and enthusiastically support increased funding for our men and women in the military. We will cover a wide variety of topics including social, economic, political, and cultural issues.

Please read more about our overall vision on “Our Mission” page.

Once again, welcome to The Liberty Preservation Alliance. We look forward writing regularly and reading your comments.