Archive for June, 2008

Wesley Clark, how does it feel to be used as a propaganda tool? [Updated]

As reported by Ben Smith at his Politico blog, retired General and Democratic attack dog Wesley Clark will not back down from his crazy rhetoric over Senator John McCain’s military service. It’s truly a sad sight to see Clark disrespect McCain over his perceived shortcomings in Senator McCain’s military experience as fighter pilot, POW, and squadron commander. Clark somehow believes that being the commander of the largest squadron in the Navy isn’t applicable military experience - hogwash.

I’m confused. Now, what is the rookie senator’s relevant experience? Whoops, I forgot, he doesn’t have any!

I wonder how does it make General Clark feel to know that Senator Obama’s spokesperson has denounced his inane rhetoric. Also, how does it make Clark feel to know that his absurd comments have motivated me and many others to donate more money to Senator McCain? I wonder if Clark is truly making these comments free of coordination with the Obama campaign. Regardless, as I emphasized before, his statements only bring clearer into focus Obama’s poor judgment by associating with anti-American rhetoric hate merchants like Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, and Michael Pfleger.

It also makes General Clark look like a major propaganda tool as Senator Obama moves farther and farther to the right on Iraq. Perhaps the retired general would enjoy reading The New Yorkers piece titled “Obama’s Iraq Problem” that shows that Obama is really just a flip-flopping politician on Iraq as his political needs change with the successes on the ground in Iraq.

General Clark, it appears to me that you are being used like a propaganda tool by the Democratic party as an attack dog against McCain. How does that make you feel?

******

Update:

Allahpundit over at Hot Air adds the following comments:

The more I re-read this and the transcript of what he said on Face the Nation, the more mystifying it is — not because it’s offensive or even controversial (although the insinuation that anyone who hasn’t “ordered the bombs to fall” doesn’t understand the gravity of war is mighty rich vis-a-vis a POW), but because it’s so lame. His point is simply that being bastinadoed by enemy agents won’t inculcate any finer appreciation for the nuances of geopolitical strategy. Er, true enough, except (a) the power of McCain’s Vietnam experience is in its testament to his character, not his mad foreign policy skillz, and (b) no one who supports a guy who cites a few weeks spent in Pakistan on a college trip as a serious policy credential should be raising the subject of executive qualifications with a straight face.

The Conservative Pulse: The loons on the left attacking McCain’s military record, and more

  • As mentioned earlier, Senator Obama, the rookie senator from Illinois, and his campaign’s surrogate in the form of failed presidential aspirant Wesley Clark has gone on the offensive against McCain’s military record. I’m betting this will backfire and is this an early hint at what the followers of O fear to be a great weakness for the Obamacle? I think so — just think Ayers, Wright, Pfleger, etc… [Sources: Weekly Standard, Politico, and Newsmax]
  • Mitt Romney is reported to top the list of possible V.P. choices for Senator John McCain. [Source: Townhall]
  • Pajamas Media looks at the idea that Obama is the Democrats’ Reagan. Hardly! [Source: Pajamas Media]
  • Here is another indication that the worshiping of the Obamacle has taken on cult-like qualities. Sad and scary. [Source: Ace of Spades]
  • Townhall’s Dinesh D’Souza takes another look at Michelle Obama. [Source: Townhall]

Obama’s surrogate attacks McCain on military experience, Obama to give speech on patriotism, typical liberal BS, and more [updated]

It appears that the the rookie senator’s supporter and advocate retired General Wesley Clark, the same retired general who failed at his Democratic presidential bid in 2004 and who was fired by President Bill Clinton, has decided to attack Senator John McCain on his military record. Well once again that’s audacious, but hardly change that we should believe in. Is Obama orchestrating a smear campaign against a war hero. Pathetic. (Update according to Obama’s spokesperson no.)

Actually, I urge the Senator’s supporters to keep it up because it just amplifies Obama’s associations with terrorists (Bill Ayers), sleazy slum lords (Tony Rezko), anti-American rhetoric spewing pastors (Jeremiah Wright and Micheal Pfleger), and campaign workers involved in the disastrous Chicago housing project, Grove Parc, that Obama helped secure financing for as an Illinois senator.

And now for the old one-two punch, the rookie is preparing to deliver a speech on patriotism in my home state of Missouri. We’ll see if the main stream media heralds this speech like they did his “historic speech on race” where he was in the process of throwing his 20 year spiritual adviser, Jeremiah Wright, under the bus.

With his surrogates attacking McCain over his military experience, the senator’s supporters are insanely opening a Pandora’s box back on to Obama’s questionable associations and utter lack of substantial experience.

*********

[Update 6/30/2008]
Little Green Footballs has announced that Wesley Clark has been thrown under the bus also. It sure is getting crowded under there. ;-)

More from Political Punch and guest blogger Rick Klein on Wesley “Clunker” Clark.

Obama’s Deteriorated Housing Fiasco and Cronyism: Change we can believe in?

The rookie senator from Illinois has some more explaining to do over some of his close acquaintances. Binyamin Appelbaum writing for the Boston Globe looks at the housing work that then state senator did in securing millions of dollars for his cronies to develop and/or manage Chicago housing. Appelbaum writes in his article titled “Grim proving ground for Obama’s housing policy”:

Grove Parc has become a symbol for some in Chicago of the broader failures of giving public subsidies to private companies to build and manage affordable housing - an approach strongly backed by Obama as the best replacement for public housing.

As a state senator, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee coauthored an Illinois law creating a new pool of tax credits for developers. As a US senator, he pressed for increased federal subsidies. And as a presidential candidate, he has campaigned on a promise to create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund that could give developers an estimated $500 million a year.

But a Globe review found that thousands of apartments across Chicago that had been built with local, state, and federal subsidies - including several hundred in Obama’s former district - deteriorated so completely that they were no longer habitable.

Grove Parc and several other prominent failures were developed and managed by Obama’s close friends and political supporters. Those people profited from the subsidies even as many of Obama’s constituents suffered. Tenants lost their homes; surrounding neighborhoods were blighted.

Some of the residents of Grove Parc say they are angry that Obama did not notice their plight. The development straddles the boundary of Obama’s state Senate district. Many of the tenants have been his constituents for more than a decade.

“No one should have to live like this, and no one did anything about it,” said Cynthia Ashley, who has lived at Grove Parc since 1994.

Ok, so maybe the rookie shouldn’t be blamed for this right? After all, he tried his best to secure funding but it’s not his fault is somehow this project was mismanaged into deterioriation. He enabled the project but he didn’t manage it. Obama’s campaign might want you to believe this.

But please ask the dynamic Senator why did he grant failed participants in Grove Parc with critical positions on his senatorial and presedential campaigns? Appelbaum reveals the following about the change candidate:

Among those tied to Obama politically, personally, or professionally are:

Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to Obama’s presidential campaign and a member of his finance committee. Jarrett is the chief executive of Habitat Co., which managed Grove Parc Plaza from 2001 until this winter and co-managed an even larger subsidized complex in Chicago that was seized by the federal government in 2006, after city inspectors found widespread problems.

Allison Davis, a major fund-raiser for Obama’s US Senate campaign and a former lead partner at Obama’s former law firm. Davis, a developer, was involved in the creation of Grove Parc and has used government subsidies to rehabilitate more than 1,500 units in Chicago, including a North Side building cited by city inspectors last year after chronic plumbing failures resulted in raw sewage spilling into several apartments.

Cronyism and poor oversight — those don’t exactly scream change we can believe in. It’s more like change from which we should run. As more about Obama’s political comes to light, it will expose the Senator and remove the luster from his weak on experience and weak on substance campaign. Actions matter more than words. And Senator Obama, your words are starting to look a little hollow considering this story.

Can we trust anything Obama says?

Look we all know that politicians on occasion change positions or make nuanced policy shifts. But considering the rapidity at which the rookie has been flip flopping on a array of issues from gun rights to campaign finance reform, isn’t it fair to ask, can we trust anything that the man says? Obama makes John Kerry look like a novice at flip-flopping.

Senator John McCain’s campaign has released a new web-based ad nailing Obama over his hypocritical public financing flip-flop.

The Conservative Pulse: More MSM Flip-Flopping for Obama, and more

The Second Amendment Lives — DC handgun ban overturned by the Supreme Court

In a landmark 5-4 decision the United States Supreme court has overturned the DC handgun ban upholding that the Second Amendment does in fact allow US Citizens the right to own firearms for personal use. You can read about the ruling at the SCOTUS Blog.

Tom Goldstein offers his succinct bottom-line opinion of the ruling.