Author Archive for HawkEye

McCain ready to fight! It’s about time that the Maverick set the record straight on Fannie and Freddie.

It’s being reported everywhere that Senator John McCain is starting to make the valid case of attaching blame of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debacles squarely where it belongs. Today in New Mexico McCain clearly stated that he coauthored legislation to reign in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac while the Democrats fought it in effect killing the bill in committee while the rookie Obama remained silent.

I applaud the decision for McCain to press this important issue that speaks to judgment and experience – two things that Senator Obama lacks.

From around the conservative blogosphere, the news is being met with excitement. Here are few examples:

Michelle Malkin:

Don’t go wobbly now, McCain.

Don’t stop.

Take your own advice: Stand up and fight.

Ace of Spades:

The debate is the second-to-last chance to raise these concerns with 50 million Americans at once.

Merely making tough remarks at campaign appearances isn’t going to help.

But perhaps he’s finally heard the alarm bells.


Redstate
:

In a statement obtained by RedState, Sen. John McCain today will lay plain the crisis on Wall Street - not to mention Main Street - firmly on the narrow shoulders of those who caused it in the first place: the Democratic Party in general, and Senator Barack Obama in particular. He’s going to talk about it all. Here’s a taste:

Senator Obama has accused me of opposing regulation to avert this crisis. I guess he believes if a lie is big enough and repeated often enough it will be believed. But the truth is I was the one who called at the time for tighter restrictions on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that could have helped prevent this crisis from happening in the first place.

Senator Obama was silent on the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and his Democratic allies in Congress opposed every effort to rein them in. As recently as September of last year he said that subprime loans had been, quote, “a good idea.” Well, Senator Obama, that “good idea” has now plunged this country into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

To hear him talk now, you’d think he’d always opposed the dangerous practices at these institutions. But there is absolutely nothing in his record to suggest he did. He was surely familiar with the people who were creating this problem. The executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have advised him, and he has taken their money for his campaign. He has received more money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than any other senator in history, with the exception of the chairman of the committee overseeing them. Did he ever talk to the executives at Fannie and Freddie about these reckless loans? Did he ever discuss with them the stronger oversight I proposed? If Senator Obama is such a champion of financial regulation, why didn’t he support these regulations that could have prevented this crisis in the first place? He won’t tell you, but you deserve an answer.

To our lurkers: that’s John McCain calling your guy a gutless, two-faced coward who lets others do his fighting. Which, by the
way, is perfectly correct.

What just Happened? A video every American voter should watch.

Watch this before you decide who will receive your vote in November:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exxVZTKq1vA

Senator Shelby lambastes bill and all the Chicken Littles — votes no

Michelle Malkin has listed the telephone numbers of each US Representative who opposed the Paulson “crap-sandwich” bill earlier this week.

Please call your representative and tell them to follow Senator Richard Shelby’s lead in voting no. I watched Shelby’s speech last night on C-SPAN and was blown away by his thoughtfulness and warnings to not make a hasty decision. Heck pass along his speech to your rep.

CNSNews has coverage of it here.

Update:

Here is a video of Shelby on Lou Dobbs discussing the bill yesterday:

Ifill must step down as moderator of debate

With her pro-Obama book set to come out on Inaguration Day, PBS journalist Gwen Ifill must recuse herself as the moderator of the VP debate between Governor Sarah Palin and Obama’s running mate since she stands to profit personally from an Obama Presidency.

Furthermore, it is in the opinion of this writer, that Ifill’s decision to accept the position of moderator is shameful and implies that she has put her self interest ahead of an honest debate. The mere appearance of inappropriate motivation is a more than sufficient cause for her removal from the debate.

Understand this would be different if this conflict of interest was diclosed fully to all parties early in the process, but since it was not, I call on the Ifill to make the correct call and step down. And since that may not happen, I call on the debate commission to remove her to at the very least remove the appearance of impropriety.

Here is what other are saying about this:

Michelle Malkin:

But there is nothing “moderate” about where Ifill stands on Barack Obama. She’s so far in the tank for the Democrat presidential candidate, her oxygen delivery line is running out.

In an imaginary world where liberal journalists are held to the same standards as everyone else, Ifill would be required to make a full disclosure at the start of the debate. She would be required to turn to the cameras and tell the national audience that she has a book coming out on January 20, 2009 – a date that just happens to coincide with the inauguration of the next president of the United States.

Little Green Footballs:

Gwen Ifill should step down as moderator of the vice presidential debate

NewsBusters:

In addition to her portrait of Obama, Ifill will also investigate Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, a close friend of Obama’s; Newark Mayor Cory Booker, who Ifill describes as “very charismatic” in the video; and Rep. Artur Davis of Alabama. “They all chose to get into politics for the most upstanding of reasons, and they all have achieved much more than their parents could have hoped.” It doesn’t hurt that it’s made Obama a mega-best-selling multi-millionaire author.

Ifill presents Obama and the others as the idealistic successors of Martin Luther King: “This book is about a generation of people who took seriously the achievements that their parents fought for. They knew that Martin Luther King did what he did so they can do what they’re doing, and they decided to follow through.”

RedState:

Note that neither Ms. Malkin nor I am suggesting that Ms. Ifill stop moderating the debate; merely that she let the viewing public know right from the start that it’s in Ms. Ifill’s long-term financial interest that Senator Obama win the Presidency. They call it “transparency:” it’s quite the coming thing. The media should try it sometime.

Amanda Carpenter:

“I confirmed for us here on GretaWire: the McCain campaign did NOT know about Gwen Ifill’s book,” Fox anchor Greta Van Susteren reported on her blog, GretaWire, a day before the debate is scheduled to occur.

Conservative websites were on fire Wednesday morning after it was discovered moderator Gwen Ifill was planning to release a book about Barack Obama’s impact on race and politics on January 20, 2009.

Defeat the fear mongering! Kill all future Bailout Bills!

Excellent work. Step one is down.

The bailout bill was killed on the floor of the House of Representatives yesterday.

Please continue to write and call your congressmen and congresswomen and let them know that you oppose the socialization of our economy. Please use the following link to let keep the pressure on:

https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

They must be receiving considerable pressure because I just received the following:

Messaging Service Unavailable

The House of Representatives is currently experiencing an extraordinarily high amount of email traffic. The Write Your Representative function is therefore intermittantly available. While we realize communicating to your Members of Congress is critical, we suggest attempting to do so at a later time, when demand is not so high. System engineers are working to resolve this issue and we appreciate your patience.

Here are two articles that I heavily recommend you read. Both are being linked to by Drudge:

  1. Commentary: Bankruptcy, not bailout, is the right answer
  2. Bailout marks Karl Marx’s comeback

Michelle Malkin continues her excellent coverage of the fear mongering perpetrated by the media, certain members of congress, and our administration — shame on them. Keep up the great work Michelle!!!

Sarah-cuda tells Biden to bring it on!

Scaring the public? How did they decide that the correct number was $700 billion?

From the LA Times:

You know where that very important $700-billion figure came from?

Here’s a quote from that Forbes story:

“It’s not based on any particular data point,” a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. “We just wanted to choose a really large number.”

They made it up to be sufficiently ginormous to frighten everyone into rapid action.

And it worked.

Hat tip: Michelle Malkin — Michelle has throughout this bailout vote been a voice of fiscal conservatism and limited governmental power — keep up the great work Michelle.